Cryogenic Deflashing Standard and Model Selection Guide
How to judge whether your part is suitable, what flash thickness works, and which PG-series machine to choose
NANJING PEGE TECHNO MACHINE CO., LTD | Frozen Shot PG Series | Technical Guide 2026
Cryogenic deflashing is not a universal process. It works brilliantly on some parts and fails on others, and the difference usually comes down to three measurable factors: material, flash thickness, and part geometry. This guide sets out the standards PEGE applies in production, explains the physical principle behind them, and then walks through machine selection for the PG-series range.
It is written for process engineers, tooling engineers and purchasing managers who need a straight answer before committing to a machine or a trial.
|
Quick answer Suitable: rubber and elastomers, glass-fibre reinforced engineering plastics, thermoplastic elastomers, and zinc or magnesium die-castings. Flash thickness: under 0.2 mm for rubber, under 0.15 mm for plastics, and under 0.1 mm for silicone. Thinner is always better. Shape: small parts (roughly smaller than a fist), rounded profiles without sharp edges, and flash that is long, thin or hidden in holes and difficult to trim by hand. Not suitable: pure PA, pure PC, ABS, PP, HDPE, ETFE, thin-wall or fragile parts, and parts where the flash is as thick as the body. |
1. What Parts Are Suitable for Cryogenic Deflashing
Cryogenic deflashing removes mould flash by freezing it until it becomes brittle, then blasting it away with polycarbonate media while the part body stays resilient. The process therefore depends on one condition: the flash must embrittle before the part body does. Everything in this section follows from that single rule.
1.1 Suitable material groups
PEGE machines process three broad material families. Each requires a different temperature setting, and each behaves differently at low temperature.
|
Material group |
Typical materials |
Suitability |
Practical notes |
|
Rubber and elastomers |
NR, NBR, HNBR, CR, EPDM, FKM, ACM, SBR, PU |
Excellent |
The most common application. Proven on O-rings, gaskets, seals and custom moulded parts. |
|
Silicone (VMQ) |
Silicone rubber |
Difficult |
Requires below -110 C, round robust shapes and flash under 0.1 mm. Lower success rate; sample test essential. |
|
Engineering plastics |
PA+GF, PC+GF, POM, PPS, PBT, PET, PEEK, PPSU/PSU, LCP |
Good |
Glass-fibre reinforcement is normally required. Works best on precision injection-moulded parts with thin flash. |
|
Thermoplastic elastomers |
TPU, TPO, TPV, EVA, TPR, TPE |
Good |
Most TPE grades respond well because of a clear embrittlement differential. |
|
Die-cast metals |
Zinc alloys, magnesium alloys |
Good |
Thin die-cast flash becomes friable at relatively warm settings. The metal body is unaffected. |
Suitability ratings reflect PEGE production experience. They are a starting point, not a guarantee. Any new compound should be sample tested before production parameters are fixed.
1.2 Materials that are generally not suitable
The following materials have been verified through years of production as poor candidates. In most cases the flash and the part body embrittle together, so the process cannot selectively remove flash without damaging the part.
• Pure PA (unfilled nylon): becomes over-brittle and risks cracking. Use PA+30%GF instead.
• Pure PC (unfilled polycarbonate): no reliable flash-to-part differential. Use PC+30%GF instead.
• ABS: flash and body harden together, so removal is not selective.
• PP (polypropylene): general-purpose polyolefin with poor low-temperature response.
• HDPE: insufficient embrittlement differential.
• ETFE (Tefzel): not suitable for cryogenic deflashing.
This list is not exhaustive. A material that is not explicitly listed as suitable should always be tested first.
1.3 Typical parts and industries
Beyond material, the part family is a useful first filter. The applications below are routinely processed on PEGE machines.
|
Industry |
Typical parts |
Why cryogenic deflashing fits |
|
Automotive |
O-rings, oil seals, weather strips, grommets, suspension and PU bumper components |
Complex parting lines and hidden flash that manual trimming cannot reach consistently. |
|
Medical |
Seals, gaskets, surgical instrument components, implant components |
Clean, dry, residue-free finish with no cutting marks and no hand contact. |
|
Electronics |
Connectors, bobbins, switches, micro-precision plastic parts |
Small parts with fine flash and tight dimensional tolerances. |
|
Industrial and hydraulic |
Valve blocks, manifolds, washers, fittings, flexible boots |
Internal flash in cross-holes and blind holes is removed in one operation. |
|
Consumer and hardware |
Decorative zinc die-castings, enclosures, trim parts |
Uniform finish on thin die-cast flash without polishing marks. |
2. Flash Thickness Standard
2.1 Why flash thickness decides everything
The process relies on differential embrittlement. A thin section of material cools far faster than a thick section, because it has less thermal mass and a much larger surface area relative to its volume. In a cryogenic chamber, the thin flash reaches its brittle point while the thicker part body is still flexible.
That creates a processing window, typically a few minutes wide, in which the polycarbonate media can crack the frozen flash away without abrading the part. If the flash is too thick, it cools at roughly the same rate as the body, the window closes, and the machine either leaves flash behind or starts removing base material.
This is why flash thickness, not part weight or part count, is the single most important number to measure before selecting a machine.
2.2 Flash thickness limits
PEGE applies the following design standard in production. It is the figure to quote to your tooling team when a mould is being specified or reworked.
|
Material |
Maximum flash thickness |
Comment |
|
Rubber and elastomers |
< 0.20 mm |
PEGE production standard. Thinner flash gives a wider process window and lower nitrogen consumption. |
|
Engineering plastics |
< 0.15 mm |
Applies to glass-fibre reinforced grades such as PA+GF and PC+GF. |
|
Silicone (VMQ) |
< 0.10 mm |
Flash must also be non-tacky on the part body, otherwise it will not break away cleanly. |
|
Zinc and magnesium die-cast |
Thin flash only |
No fixed figure is published because die-cast flash varies by die and alloy. Sample testing is required. |
Flash thickness should be measured at the thickest point of the parting line, not at an average. A single thick cavity can dictate the cycle for the whole batch.
2.3 What to do when flash is too thick
Thick flash is a moulding problem, not a deflashing problem. If the parting line exceeds the limits above, the correct sequence is to correct the mould first, or to remove the bulk of the flash mechanically and then use cryogenic deflashing for the final clean-up.
Running a thick-flash part through a cryogenic machine usually produces one of two outcomes: residual flash that fails inspection, or a longer cycle with higher nitrogen consumption that erodes the cost advantage of the process. Neither is a good basis for equipment selection.
2.4 A quick measurement method
• Take a moulded part straight from the tool, before any trimming.
• Measure the flash at the thickest point of the parting line with a micrometer or a profile projector.
• Record the value separately for each cavity, or at least for the worst cavity.
• Compare against the limits in section 2.2 and note the margin.
• If the value is borderline, send samples for a trial rather than relying on the calculation.
3. Part Geometry and Shape Rules
Geometry decides how evenly the media reaches the flash, and how much risk there is of damaging the part. The rules below are the ones PEGE applies when assessing a new part.
|
Geometric feature |
Assessment |
Reason |
|
Part fits roughly within a fist |
Ideal |
Barrel volume is the constraint on output. Small parts mean more pieces per cycle and a lower cost per piece. |
|
Rounded body, no sharp edges or weak angles |
Ideal |
Media flows around the part without concentrating stress on a thin edge. |
|
Long flash along the parting line |
Ideal |
A long, thin fin has low thermal mass and breaks away cleanly. |
|
Flash hidden in holes, slots or recesses |
Ideal |
This is exactly where manual trimming is slowest and least consistent. |
|
Flat, uniform flash within the thickness limit |
Ideal |
Even cooling and even media impact give a repeatable result. |
|
Thin walls, diaphragms, very thin sections |
Caution |
If the body is as thin as the flash, both embrittle together and selectivity is lost. |
|
Sharp, delicate edges or fine cosmetic surfaces |
Caution |
Requires lower wheel speed and shorter cycles; test first. |
|
Holes and cavities smaller than about 0.4 mm |
Caution |
Polycarbonate media loses its cutting effect in very small openings. Fine features may need a different method. |
|
Metal inserts or bonded dissimilar materials |
High risk |
Different thermal contraction can loosen inserts or cause delamination during tumbling. |
|
Very soft silicone with fragile edges and tacky flash |
High risk |
Low success rate even at the coldest settings. |
3.1 Size and loading
There is no single maximum part size that applies across the range, because barrel volume differs by model. The practical rule is that parts should be comfortably smaller than the barrel and, for good economics, roughly smaller than a fist. A large part occupies barrel volume that could otherwise hold many small parts, so the cost per piece rises quickly.
Loading also matters. The barrel should not be filled to capacity, because parts need room to tumble and present all surfaces to the media. Overloading is one of the most common causes of incomplete deflashing.
3.2 Shape and edge quality
Rounded parts perform best. Sharp corners and thin protruding features are the first places to suffer damage, because blast media concentrates impact energy on a small area. Where a part has both robust and delicate features, the usual approach is to reduce wheel speed and extend cycle time slightly, then verify on samples.
3.3 Flash location
Counter-intuitively, parts that are difficult to trim by hand are often the best candidates for cryogenic deflashing. Flash that runs through a cross-hole, sits in a recess, or wraps around a complex profile is hard to reach with a knife but is fully exposed to tumbling media.
4. Process Window by Material
Once a part passes the material, thickness and geometry checks, the process window is set by temperature and cycle time. The table below gives the starting range PEGE uses. All PG-series machines operate across -130 C to +50 C, which covers every material group.
|
Material group |
Typical processing temperature |
Typical cycle time |
|
Rubber and elastomers |
-60 C to -110 C |
3 to 10 minutes |
|
Engineering plastics |
-60 C to -30 C |
3 to 10 minutes |
|
Zinc and magnesium die-cast |
-40 C to -20 C |
3 to 10 minutes |
|
Silicone (VMQ) |
-100 C to -120 C or below |
Longer; higher nitrogen consumption |
These are starting points, not fixed recipes. Harder compounds embrittle at warmer settings and need less nitrogen; softer compounds need colder settings and more nitrogen. Final parameters are set on samples and then stored as recipes on the machine controller.
Media size is the second adjustment. Smaller media (around 0.75 mm) suits small parts and fine features; larger media (around 1.0 mm) suits heavier parts and thicker flash. Wheel speed and barrel speed are then tuned to balance removal rate against surface protection.
5. Model Selection Guide
The PG-series covers five standard models plus an advanced configuration. Selection is a five-step process, and the machine specification tables that follow let you match a model to your production requirement.
5.1 Five steps to the right model
Step 1 - Confirm material suitability. Check the part against section 1. If the material is on the unsuitable list, stop here.
Step 2 - Measure flash thickness. Compare the worst-case parting line against the limits in section 2.2.
Step 3 - Assess geometry. Use section 3 to identify fragile features, inserts and very small openings.
Step 4 - Calculate daily output. Convert your production plan into kilograms per day, not pieces per day. Barrel capacity and loading density are volumetric, so weight is the comparable unit.
Step 5 - Match capacity and blast capability. Choose the smallest model whose rated output covers your requirement with a reasonable margin, then confirm wheel size and blast speed are adequate for the part weight.
5.2 Model comparison: capacity and output
|
Model |
Barrel capacity |
Effective capacity |
Blast wheel |
Blast speed |
Reference output |
|
PG-40T |
40 L |
15 L |
250 mm |
105.7 m/s |
150 - 200 kg/day |
|
PG-60T |
60 L |
20 L |
250 mm |
105.7 m/s |
200 - 250 kg/day |
|
PG-80T |
80 L |
30 L |
300 mm |
123.3 m/s |
250 - 300 kg/day |
|
PG-120T |
120 L |
40 L |
350 mm |
145.3 m/s |
400 - 500 kg/day |
|
PG-150T |
150 L |
50 L |
350 mm |
105.7 m/s |
500 - 600 kg/day |
Reference output is based on typical loading and cycle time. Actual output depends on part weight, loading density, flash thickness and the cycle required for your material.
5.3 Model comparison: electrical and dimensions
|
Model |
Power |
Wheel speed |
Dimensions (L x W x H) |
Weight |
|
PG-40T |
4 kW |
3000 - 7200 rpm |
1080 x 960 x 1460 mm |
500 kg |
|
PG-60T |
6 kW |
3000 - 7200 rpm |
1000 x 1000 x 1950 mm |
700 kg |
|
PG-80T |
7 kW |
3000 - 7000 rpm |
1100 x 1200 x 2000 mm |
850 kg |
|
PG-120T |
8 kW |
3000 - 7200 rpm |
1200 x 1250 x 2200 mm |
1000 kg |
|
PG-150T |
9 kW |
3000 - 7000 rpm |
1300 x 1350 x 2250 mm |
1500 kg |
All models: power supply AC 380 V, 50/60 Hz, 3 phase; cooling range -130 C to +50 C; cooling media liquid nitrogen; blasting media polycarbonate granule; barrel speed 0-25 rpm; touch screen operation.
5.4 Selection by daily output
If your requirement is already expressed in kilograms per day, the table below gives a direct starting point. Choose the model whose range covers your normal production day, then check whether peak days can be absorbed by extra shifts rather than by a larger machine.
|
Required output |
Recommended model |
Typical fit |
|
150 - 200 kg/day |
PG-40T |
Small parts, multi-material workshops, sample and trial work, cost-sensitive buyers. |
|
200 - 250 kg/day |
PG-60T |
Single-product lines with moderate volume; the most common entry point for rubber parts. |
|
250 - 300 kg/day |
PG-80T |
Mixed production with medium parts; a good balance of capacity and floor space. |
|
400 - 500 kg/day |
PG-120T |
High-volume production, larger parts, and PU bumper or large moulded components. |
|
500 - 600 kg/day |
PG-150T |
Continuous high-volume lines and the largest parts in the range. |
5.5 Selection by part and batch profile
• Small parts, high piece count: PG-40T or PG-60T. A smaller barrel filled efficiently usually beats a large barrel running half empty.
• Medium parts, mixed materials: PG-80T. The 300 mm wheel and higher blast speed handle heavier parts without extending the cycle.
• Large moulded parts or PU bumpers: PG-120T. This is the model PEGE specifies for polyurethane bumper applications.
• Continuous three-shift production: PG-150T, with the 50 L effective capacity reducing the number of cycles per shift.
• Frequent material changeovers or trial work: PG-40T. Its small chamber volume keeps cool-down fast and nitrogen use low during short runs.
6. Worked Examples
The parameter sets below are real production references. They show how the general rules translate into settings for three different material families.
Example 1 - NBR O-rings on PG-80T
Part: NBR O-ring, 2 mm inside diameter, 20 mm outside diameter.
|
Parameter |
Setting |
|
Temperature |
-75 C |
|
Blasting time |
5 minutes |
|
Media size |
1.0 mm polycarbonate |
|
Blasting speed |
6,000 rpm |
|
Barrel speed |
20 rpm |
|
Load per cycle |
approximately 3.5 kg |
This configuration delivers clean flash removal with no surface damage. It is a good baseline for small rubber seals.
